It’s been a while since Google Chrome been out on the street and I dare to say that they rocked. Everything loads fast and I especially love the way they handle each and every webpage.
Now comes the bad part. As much as I love Chrome, I just wish they would let us have some limited plugin function. One thing that I really missed from Firefox was Foxmark. I’ve got two computers, one for work and the other for games. I would really like to sync all my webpages between them without having to remove and reimport the bookmarks via Firefox.
Another thing I realized about Chrome is that they suck more juice out of my battery compared to Firefox. Chrome has a sandbox design whereby each tab has an independent operation while Firefox, shared plugin such as Flash and Java run across all the tabs. Here’s what I experimented with:
Specification: Dell Latitude D630 with Windows Vista Enterprise & Intel 4965 802.11g
Website Visited: Gmail, Wowinsider, Gizmodo, Lifehacker, Sankakucomplex, & Reallycuteasians.net
Action: I just click around the pages, checking and reading text, sometimes clicking on the picture for magnification.
Firefox: 2 hour 34 min
Chrome: 1 hour 59 min
I decided another test.
Firefox: 2 hour 15 min
Chrome: 1 hour 55 min
Pretty conclusively shown that Chrome’s sandbox feature of containing each tab to its own operation yields a more stable environment but somehow it wasn’t helpful especially if you want to squeeze out as much battery power from your notebook as much as possible.
So in conclusion, Chome may be pretty but it is more suited for desktops while Firefox is great for stay as long as possible with the limited battery power on your notebook.